0.11/0.11	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.11/0.11	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.11/0.32	% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
0.11/0.32	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.11/0.32	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.11/0.32	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.11/0.32	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.11/0.32	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.11/0.32	% WCLimit    : 180
0.11/0.32	% DateTime   : Thu Jul  4 06:08:09 EDT 2024
0.18/0.33	% CPUTime    : 
0.19/0.47	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.19/0.47	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KKohuqxkYs/E---3.1_8381.p
0.19/0.49	# Version: 3.2.0-ho
0.19/0.49	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLMNHSN.
0.19/0.49	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.19/0.49	# Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 900s (5) cores
0.19/0.49	# Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 180s (1) cores
0.19/0.49	# Starting sh2l with 180s (1) cores
0.19/0.49	# Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with 180s (1) cores
0.19/0.49	# ho_unfolding_6 with pid 8480 completed with status 0
0.19/0.49	# Result found by ho_unfolding_6
0.19/0.49	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLMNHSN.
0.19/0.49	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.19/0.49	# Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 900s (5) cores
0.19/0.49	# No SInE strategy applied
0.19/0.49	# Search class: HUUNF-FFSF00-MHSFMFNN
0.19/0.49	# partial match(2): HUUNF-FFSF00-SHSSMFNN
0.19/0.49	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
0.19/0.49	# Starting new_ho_10 with 487s (1) cores
0.19/0.49	# Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 91s (1) cores
0.19/0.49	# Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 82s (1) cores
0.19/0.49	# Starting lpo1_def_fix with 82s (1) cores
0.19/0.49	# Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 82s (1) cores
0.19/0.49	# new_ho_10 with pid 8486 completed with status 9
0.19/0.49	# Starting sh5l with 76s (1) cores
0.19/0.49	# ho_unfolding_6 with pid 8487 completed with status 0
0.19/0.49	# Result found by ho_unfolding_6
0.19/0.49	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLMNHSN.
0.19/0.49	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.19/0.49	# Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 900s (5) cores
0.19/0.49	# No SInE strategy applied
0.19/0.49	# Search class: HUUNF-FFSF00-MHSFMFNN
0.19/0.49	# partial match(2): HUUNF-FFSF00-SHSSMFNN
0.19/0.49	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
0.19/0.49	# Starting new_ho_10 with 487s (1) cores
0.19/0.49	# Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 91s (1) cores
0.19/0.49	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.19/0.49	
0.19/0.49	# Proof found!
0.19/0.49	# SZS status Theorem
0.19/0.49	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.19/0.49	thf(decl_22, type, leibeq: ($o > $o > $o) > ($o > $o > $o) > $o).
0.19/0.49	thf(decl_23, type, epred1_0: ($o > $o > $o) > $o).
0.19/0.49	thf(decl_24, type, esk1_0: $o).
0.19/0.49	thf(decl_25, type, esk2_0: $o).
0.19/0.49	thf(leibeq, axiom, ((leibeq)=(^[X1:$o > $o > $o, X2:$o > $o > $o]:(![X3:($o > $o > $o) > $o]:(((X3 @ X1)=>(X3 @ X2)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KKohuqxkYs/E---3.1_8381.p', leibeq)).
0.19/0.49	thf(conj, conjecture, (leibeq @ (^[X4:$o, X5:$o]:(((X5)&(X4)))) @ (^[X6:$o, X7:$o]:(~((~((X6))|~((X7))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KKohuqxkYs/E---3.1_8381.p', conj)).
0.19/0.49	thf(c_0_2, plain, ((leibeq)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$o > $o > $o, Z1:$o > $o > $o]:(![X3:($o > $o > $o) > $o]:(((X3 @ Z0)=>(X3 @ Z1)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[leibeq])).
0.19/0.49	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ~(![X8:($o > $o > $o) > $o]:(((X8 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:$o, Z1:$o]:((Z1&Z0))))=>(X8 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:$o, Z1:$o]:(~((~(Z0)|~(Z1))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj])]), c_0_2])).
0.19/0.49	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ((epred1_0 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:$o, Z1:$o]:((Z1&Z0))))&~(epred1_0 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:$o, Z1:$o]:(~((~(Z0)|~(Z1))))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])])).
0.19/0.49	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ~((epred1_0 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:$o, Z1:$o]:(~((~((Z0))|~((Z1)))))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.19/0.49	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:$o, Z1:$o]:(((Z1)&(Z0))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.19/0.49	thf(c_0_7, plain, ((^[Z0/* 19 */:$o, Z1:$o]:(~((~((Z0))|~((Z1))))))!=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$o, Z1:$o]:(((Z1)&(Z0))))), inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6])).
0.19/0.49	thf(c_0_8, plain, (~((~((esk1_0))|~((esk2_0))))<~>((esk2_0)&(esk1_0))), inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.19/0.49	thf(c_0_9, plain, (esk1_0), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])).
0.19/0.49	thf(c_0_10, plain, (esk2_0), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])).
0.19/0.49	thf(c_0_11, plain, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])]), c_0_9]), c_0_10])]), ['proof']).
0.19/0.49	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.19/0.49	# Parsed axioms                        : 3
0.19/0.49	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.19/0.49	# Initial clauses                      : 3
0.19/0.49	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
0.19/0.49	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 2
0.19/0.49	# Processed clauses                    : 9
0.19/0.49	# ...of these trivial                  : 1
0.19/0.49	# ...subsumed                          : 0
0.19/0.49	# ...remaining for further processing  : 7
0.19/0.49	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.19/0.49	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.19/0.49	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.19/0.49	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.19/0.49	# Generated clauses                    : 9
0.19/0.49	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 9
0.19/0.49	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.19/0.49	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.19/0.49	# Paramodulations                      : 0
0.19/0.49	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.19/0.49	# NegExts                              : 3
0.19/0.49	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.19/0.49	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.19/0.49	# Total rewrite steps                  : 3
0.19/0.49	# ...of those cached                   : 1
0.19/0.49	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.19/0.49	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.19/0.49	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.19/0.49	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.19/0.49	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.19/0.49	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.19/0.49	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.19/0.49	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.19/0.49	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.19/0.49	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.19/0.49	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.19/0.49	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.19/0.49	# Current number of processed clauses  : 6
0.19/0.49	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
0.19/0.49	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.19/0.49	#    Negative unit clauses             : 3
0.19/0.49	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
0.19/0.49	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2
0.19/0.49	# ...number of literals in the above   : 3
0.19/0.49	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.19/0.49	# Current number of archived clauses   : 1
0.19/0.49	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
0.19/0.49	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.19/0.49	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
0.19/0.49	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.19/0.49	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.19/0.49	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.19/0.49	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.19/0.49	# Condensation attempts                : 9
0.19/0.49	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.19/0.49	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 496
0.19/0.49	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 59
0.19/0.49	
0.19/0.49	# -------------------------------------------------
0.19/0.49	# User time                : 0.003 s
0.19/0.49	# System time              : 0.004 s
0.19/0.49	# Total time               : 0.008 s
0.19/0.49	# Maximum resident set size: 1800 pages
0.19/0.49	
0.19/0.49	# -------------------------------------------------
0.19/0.49	# User time                : 0.010 s
0.19/0.49	# System time              : 0.009 s
0.19/0.49	# Total time               : 0.019 s
0.19/0.49	# Maximum resident set size: 1720 pages
0.19/0.49	% E---3.1 exiting
0.19/0.49	% E exiting
0.19/0.49	EOF